The Influence of Frequency and Type of Internet Use on Family Cohesion Through the Mediation of Family Time and Family Conflict

Main Article Content

keyarsha widiyanto
Ikhsan Fuady, S.P., M.Si
Ikhsan Fuady, S.P., M.Si3

Abstract

ABSTRACT


The development of the internet impacts family dynamics through changes in interaction patterns, family time, and family conflict. This study aims to analyze the effect of internet usage frequency and type on family cohesion, mediated by family time and family conflict. Using a quantitative approach with a survey design, data were collected from 100 family respondents with adolescents aged 13–20 years through questionnaires and analyzed using the PLS-SEM method. The findings reveal that the frequency of internet use negatively correlates with family cohesion due to increased conflict, whereas internet use for educational purposes positively influences family cohesion through family time mediation. This study highlights that online activities, such as gaming or social media, tend to escalate family conflicts, while educational activities enhance family cohesion. Additionally, family time serves as a crucial mediator in mitigating the negative effects of internet usage. With proper regulation, the internet can become a tool for fostering family harmony. This research provides significant implications for families and policymakers to maximize the positive potential of technology while minimizing its risks of family conflicts caused by internet use.

Article Details

How to Cite
widiyanto, keyarsha, Ikhsan Fuady, S.P., M.Si, & Ikhsan Fuady, S.P., M.Si3. (2025). The Influence of Frequency and Type of Internet Use on Family Cohesion Through the Mediation of Family Time and Family Conflict. AT-TAWASUL, 4(1), 42-58. https://doi.org/10.51192/ja.v4i1.1465
Section
Articles

References

Berardo, F. M. (1998). Family privacy: Issues and concepts. Journal of Family Issues, 19(4), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251398019004001

Daly, K. J. (1996). Families and time: Keeping pace in a hurried culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Dubas, J. S., & Gerris, J. R. M. (2002). Longitudinal changes in the time parents spend in activities with their adolescent children as a function of child age, pubertal status and gender. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(4), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.16.4.415

Hair, Joseph & Risher, Jeff & Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian. (2018). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. 31. 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.

Hofferth, S. L., & Sandberg, J. F. (2001). How American children spend their time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00295.x

Hofferth, S. L., & Sandberg, J. F. (2001). How American children spend their time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00295.x

Hughes, R., & Hans, J. D. (2001). Computers, the internet, and families a review of the role new technology plays in family life. Journal of Family Issues, 22(6), 776-790. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251301022006006

Jackson, L.A., Eye, A.V., Barbatsis, G., Biocca, F., Zhao, Y., & Fitzgerald, H.E. (2003). Internet attitudes and Internet use: some surprising findings from the HomeNetToo project. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 59, 355-382.

Kaiser Family Foundation. (2003). Growing up wired: Survey of youth and the Internet in the Silicon Valley.

Kiesler, S., Zdaniuk, B., Lundmark, V., & Kraut, R. (2000). Troubles With the Internet: The Dynamics of Help at Home. Human–Computer Interaction, 15(4), 323–351. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1504_2

Lenhart, A., et al. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant-message generation. Pew Internet & American Life Project.

Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. (2004). UK children go online. London School of Economics.

Mesch, G. S. (2003). The Family and the Internet: The Israeli Case. Social Science Quarterly, 84(4), 1038–1050. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0038-4941.2003.08404016.x

Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family relations and the Internet: Exploring a family boundaries approach. Journal of Family Communication, 6(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0602_2

Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family relations and the Internet: Exploring a family boundaries approach. Journal of Family Communication, 6(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0602_2

Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family Relations and the Internet: Exploring a Family Boundaries Approach. Journal of Family Communication, 6(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327698jfc0602_2

Nie, N. H., et al. (2004). Internet use and social isolation. Stanford Center for the Quantitative Study of Society.

Orthner, D. K., & Mancini, J. A. (1991). Benefits of leisure experiences for family bonding. Benefits of Leisure.

Sanders, C. E., Field, T. M., Diego, M., & Kaplan, M. (2000). The relationship of Internet use to depression and social isolation among adolescents. Adolescence, 35(138), 237–242.

Turow, J. (2001). Family Boundaries, Commercialism, and the Internet: A Framework for Research. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 73-86.

Zabriskie, R. B., & McCormick, B. P. (2001). The influences of family leisure patterns on perceptions of family functioning. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 50(3), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00281.x