|FOCUS AND SCOPE|
|PEER REVIEW PROCESS|
|OPEN ACCESS POLICY|
Some of the policies in the CONS-IEDU review: Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal: Each submitted article will be reviewed by the editor. The review process uses a double-blind review, that is, the reviewer does not know the identity of the author, and the writer does not know the identity of the reviewer. In the review process, the reviewer considers the suitability of the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion (findings) and conclusions.
In addition, the editor also considers the novelty, scientific impact, and references used in the article. The reviewers' responses will be the basis for the Editors to conclude:
Resubmit for review
An article is rejected for publication for various reasons, including:
Article not in accordance with the scope of the journal.
Articles do not follow the rules for writing scientific papers or author guidelines.
Fundamental methodological error.
The author refuses to provide suggestions for improvement given by the reviewers without any logical basis.
There are indications of plagiarism of more than 20%.
Islamic Guidance and Counseling Study Program, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teaching Science, Bogor Ummul Quro Al-Islami Institute
Jln. Moh. Noh Nur No.112 Leuwiliang Bogor 16640, e-mail: email@example.com
CONS-IEDU: Islamic Guidance and Counseling JournalÂ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.