POLA KOMUNIKASI GURU DAN SISWA PADA METODE ‘LEARN TO PLAY’ DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BAHASA INGGRIS ANAK
Main Article Content
Abstract
The English proficiency of Indonesian society remains relatively low, ranking 79th out of 113 countries. One contributing factor is that English learning is not introduced early in childhood. This study aims to analyze the communication patterns between teachers and students in the implementation of the Learn to Play method and its effect on improving children's English proficiency at the Children English Club (CEC) be Smart. This research employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive method. Data were collected through interviews, direct observation, and documentation. The results show that teachers apply three communication patterns: one-way, two-way, and multi-way. Among these, the two-way communication pattern is the most frequently used and considered the most effective, as it allows intensive reciprocal interaction supported by an interpersonal communication approach. Furthermore, the implementation of the Learn to Play method successfully improves children's English proficiency significantly. This method presents learning in the form of enjoyable games, making children more motivated, less pressured, and able to grasp the material more quickly. Therefore, the study concludes that the combination of two-way communication and the Learn to Play method effectively supports the enhancement of English proficiency in early childhood
Article Details
References
Adolph, R. (2016). Kemampuan bahasa Inggris anak (pp. 1–23).
Aidilsyah, M. R. (2017). KARTAR (Kartu Pintar): Media pembelajaran alternatif berbasis Learn and Play Method untuk anak tunarungu (pp. 1–9).
Amalia, A. R., Maksum, A., & Nurhasanah, N. (2024). Keragaman bahasa pada siswa sekolah dasar: Analisis perbandingan kemampuan bahasa daerah, bahasa nasional, dan bahasa asing. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 13(001), 227–236.
Anggraini, E. S. (2021). Pola komunikasi guru dalam pembelajaran anak usia dini melalui bermain. Jurnal Bunga Rampai Usia Emas, 7(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.24114/jbrue.v7i1.25783
Charlotte, A. H., Pendahuluan, A., & Nuh, M. (2013). Dini versus budaya lokal (pp. 63–72).
Collins, S. P., Storrow, A., Liu, D., Jenkins, C. A., Miller, K. F., Kampe, C., & Butler, J. (2021). No title (pp. 10–35).
Decker, J. (2024). Interpersonal. In CEO (pp. 207–211). https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400624261.ch-028
Effendy, O. U. (2017). Ilmu komunikasi: Teori dan praktik.
Goleman, D., et al. (2019). Kajian teori komunikasi interpersonal. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
Istiqomah, N. (2016). Landasan teori pola komunikasi (pp. 1–23). https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Komunikasi_dalam_Kepemimpinan_Organisasi/jUhNDwAAQBAJ?hl=id&gbpv=1&dq=buku+pola+komunikasi+primer&printsec=frontcover
Panjaitan, I. P., & Sitompul Ningsih, S. W. (2017). BAB II (pp. 25–26). http://repository.unimus.ac.id/774/3/BAB%20II.pdfPennings, H. J. M., & Hollenstein, T. (2020). Teacher-student interactions and teacher interpersonal styles: A state space grid analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 88(3), 382–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1578724
Pertiwi, A. B., Rahmawati, A., & Hafidah, R. (2021). Metode pembelajaran kosakata bahasa Inggris pada anak usia dini. Kumara Cendekia, 9(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.20961/kc.v9i2.49037
Siahaan, F. (2022). The critical period hypothesis of second language acquisition theory of Eric Lenneberg’s. The Explora, 8(2), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.51622/explora.v8i2.643